
GeForce FX 5200

RADEON 9550
GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5200
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8 vs 35).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌1050% higher power demand at 575W vs 50W.
RADEON 9550
2017Why buy it
- ✅+337.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 137.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 575W, a 525W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

RADEON 9550
The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the RADEON 9550's 35 — the RADEON 9550 leads by 337.5%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 512 (RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8 | 35+338% |
| Architecture | Rankine | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+4150% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+8554% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+103% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+1000% | 16 |
| TMUs | 680+2025% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+16285% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+38300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9550 carries 256 MB. RADEON 9550 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9550. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.25 MB (RADEON 9550) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+38300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the RADEON 9550's 50W — a 168% difference. The RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (RADEON 9550). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 50W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 152mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5200 came in at $70, while the RADEON 9550 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200 was 45.7% cheaper ($59 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.3 (RADEON 9550) — the RADEON 9550 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200 (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-46% | $129 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.3+200% |
| Codename | GB202 | Lexa |
| Release | January 30 2025 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #3 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













