A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T9300

A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T9300 Performance Spectrum

A6-5200

4 / 4

1,672

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T9300

2 / 2

1,670

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T9300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T9300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5200

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8400, while Core 2 Duo T9300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌316.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 6W.

Core 2 Duo T9300

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 25W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,670 vs 1,672).
❌Launch MSRP is still $316 MSRP, while A6-5200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T9300 better than A6-5200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo T9300 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6-5200 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T9300 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo T9300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $316 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that A6-5200 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T9300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5200

The A6-5200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,672 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo T9300

The Core 2 Duo T9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,670 points. Launch price was $316.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-5200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T9300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-5200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the A6-5200 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9300 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9300. The A6-5200 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5200 scores 1,672 against the Core 2 Duo T9300's 1,670 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-5200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5200 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9300.

Feature	A6-5200	Core 2 Duo T9300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2048 kB	6 MB+200%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,672	1,670
Geekbench 6 Single	215	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	432

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5200 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-5200 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T9300 — the A6-5200 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-5200) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo T9300).

Feature	A6-5200	Core 2 Duo T9300
Socket	FT3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5200) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9300). The A6-5200 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8400), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5200 targets Entry Laptop, Core 2 Duo T9300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-5200 rivals Pentium N3510; Core 2 Duo T9300 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.