A6-5200 vs Pentium P6300

A6-5200 vs Pentium P6300 Performance Spectrum

A6-5200

4 / 4

1,672

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium P6300

2 / 2

1,685

+0.8%

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5200 vs Pentium P6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5200 vs Pentium P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5200

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8400, while Pentium P6300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,672 vs 1,685).

Pentium P6300

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A6-5200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5200 better than Pentium P6300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-5200 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6300 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5200 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-5200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5200 vs Pentium P6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5200

The A6-5200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,672 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium P6300

The Pentium P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-5200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium P6300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-5200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the A6-5200 versus 0.27 GHz on the Pentium P6300 — a 152.4% clock advantage for the A6-5200. The A6-5200 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium P6300 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5200 scores 1,672 against the Pentium P6300's 1,685 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium P6300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5200 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6300.

Feature	A6-5200	Pentium P6300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz+641%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.27 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,672	1,685
Geekbench 6 Single	215	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5200 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium P6300 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-5200	Pentium P6300
Socket	FT3	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-5200) / not specified (Pentium P6300). The A6-5200 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8400), while the Pentium P6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5200 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5200 rivals Pentium N3510.