Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Performance Spectrum

GeForce FX 5200
0.125 GB 575
8
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 6200A
brand logoGeForce 256
brand logoGeForce PCX 5300
brand logoGeForce FX 5200LE
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
0.5 GB 300
42
+425.0%
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9700
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9550
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9600
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
low2 FPS
medium2 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Measures 152mm instead of 175mm, a 23mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8 vs 42).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌91.7% higher power demand at 575W vs 300W.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅+425% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • ✅Draws 300W instead of 575W, a 275W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • ❌15.1% longer card at 175mm vs 152mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 425% in PassMark G3D (42 vs 8), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 170 vs 64 ray-tracing units. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce FX 5200 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200

The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leads by 425%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX 5200) vs 64 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) with 680 Tensor cores vs 128.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
G3D Mark Score
8
42+425%
Architecture
Rankine
RDNA 4.0
Process Node
5 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
21760+431%
4096
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+119%
47.84 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
2920 MHz+21%
ROPs
176+38%
128
TMUs
680+166%
256
L2 Cache
96 MB+1100%
8 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
170+166%
64
Tensor Cores
680+431%
128
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 carries 512 MB. RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+1100%
8 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
DirectX
9.0a
9.0
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
1.5
2.0+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Compensation vs VideoShader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
MPEG-2 Motion Compensation
VideoShader
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 62.9% difference. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 152mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
TDP
575W
300W-48%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
152mm
175mm
Height
100mm
100mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70
70
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200 came in at $70, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 was 100+% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200) vs Infinity (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
MSRP
$70
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
Infinity
Codename
GB202
Navi 48
Release
January 30 2025
July 23 2025
Ranking
#3
#23
Search GeForce FX 5200 on AmazonSearch RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.