Core i3-4010U
VS
E1-1200

Core i3-4010U vs E1-1200

Intel

Core i3-4010U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2013
VS
AMD

E1-1200

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4010U is positioned at rank 179 and the E1-1200 is on rank 644, so the Core i3-4010U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4010U

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
99%
#167
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
353%
#168
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
348%
#169
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
320%
#170
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
318%
#171
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
315%
#173
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
305%
#174
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
292%
#175
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
292%
#176
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
284%
#179
Core i3-4010U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#193
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
98%
#194
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1-1200

#632
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
872%
#633
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
859%
#634
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
789%
#635
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
785%
#636
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
778%
#638
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
751%
#639
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
721%
#640
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
719%
#641
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
700%
#644
E1-1200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-4010U leads in gaming performance. However, the E1-1200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-4010UE1-1200
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4010UE1-1200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4010U and E1-1200

Intel

Core i3-4010U

The Core i3-4010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,660 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

E1-1200

The E1-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,682 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4010U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E1-1200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4010U versus 1.4 GHz on the E1-1200 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-4010U. The Core i3-4010U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the E1-1200 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4010U scores 1,660 against the E1-1200's 1,682 — a 1.3% lead for the E1-1200. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010U vs 0 kB on the E1-1200.

FeatureCore i3-4010UE1-1200
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz+21%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-45%
40 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,660
1,682+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4010U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-1200 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4010UE1-1200
Socket
FCBGA1168
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010U) / not specified (E1-1200). The Core i3-4010U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the E1-1200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i3-4010UE1-1200
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile