Core i3-4010U vs E1-1200

Core i3-4010U vs E1-1200 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4010U

2 / 4

1,660

0.0%

1,682

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4010U vs E1-1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4010U vs E1-1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4010U

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while E1-1200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,660 vs 1,682).
❌2744.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 18W.

E1-1200

2012

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 18W instead of 512W, a 494W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4010U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E1-1200 better than Core i3-4010U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4010U is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E1-1200 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1-1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1-1200 still makes the most sense overall. E1-1200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4010U vs E1-1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4010U

The Core i3-4010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,660 points. Launch price was $281.

E1-1200

The E1-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,682 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4010U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E1-1200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4010U versus 1.4 GHz on the E1-1200 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-4010U. The Core i3-4010U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the E1-1200 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4010U scores 1,660 against the E1-1200's 1,682 — a 1.3% lead for the E1-1200. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010U vs 0 kB on the E1-1200.

Feature	Core i3-4010U	E1-1200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz+21%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-45%	40 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,660	1,682+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4010U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-1200 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4010U	E1-1200
Socket	FCBGA1168	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010U) / not specified (E1-1200). The Core i3-4010U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the E1-1200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010U targets Mobile.