Core i3-4010U vs Phenom X4 9350e

Core i3-4010U vs Phenom X4 9350e Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4010U

2 / 4

1,660

+0.1%

1,659

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4010U vs Phenom X4 9350e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4010U vs Phenom X4 9350e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4010U

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Phenom X4 9350e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Phenom X4 9350e

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4010U across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,659 vs 1,660).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4010U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4010U better than Phenom X4 9350e?

Yes. Core i3-4010U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4010U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 42 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4010U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4010U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008), 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4010U vs Phenom X4 9350e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4010U

The Core i3-4010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,660 points. Launch price was $281.

Phenom X4 9350e

The Phenom X4 9350e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4010U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X4 9350e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9350e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4010U versus 2 GHz on the Phenom X4 9350e — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9350e. The Core i3-4010U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9350e uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4010U scores 1,660 against the Phenom X4 9350e's 1,659 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-4010U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010U vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9350e.

Feature	Core i3-4010U	Phenom X4 9350e
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2 GHz+18%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)+50%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,660	1,659

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4010U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9350e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4010U	Phenom X4 9350e
Socket	FCBGA1168	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010U) / not specified (Phenom X4 9350e). The Core i3-4010U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Phenom X4 9350e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010U targets Mobile.