Core i3-4100E
VS
Atom C3508

Core i3-4100E vs Atom C3508

Intel

Core i3-4100E

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Atom C3508

4 Cores4 Thrd11.25 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4100E is positioned at rank 1127 and the Atom C3508 is on rank 409, so the Atom C3508 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4100E

#1114
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3574%
#1115
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3521%
#1116
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3233%
#1117
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3218%
#1118
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3189%
#1120
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3079%
#1121
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2952%
#1122
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2948%
#1123
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2868%
#1126
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
100%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
100%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1129
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
100%
#1130
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1131
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1134
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1135
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1136
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1137
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1138
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1140
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1141
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5675%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
95%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1072%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
952%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
735%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
98%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
96%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $1130
95%
#409
Atom C3508
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3508 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-4100EAtom C3508
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-4100E (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-4100EAtom C3508
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4100E and Atom C3508

Intel

Core i3-4100E

The Core i3-4100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,848 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Atom C3508

The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4100E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3508 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3508 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4100E versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i3-4100E (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-4100E uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom C3508 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4100E scores 1,848 against the Atom C3508's 1,831 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-4100E. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4100E vs 8 MB on the Atom C3508.

FeatureCore i3-4100EAtom C3508
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+50%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+50%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
8 MB+167%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
8 MB+3100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Goldmont (2016−2017)
PassMark
1,848
1,831
Geekbench 6 Single
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4100E uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3508 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100E versus DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 — the Atom C3508 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4100E) vs 12 (Atom C3508) — the Core i3-4100E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: QM87,HM86,HM87 (Core i3-4100E) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508).

FeatureCore i3-4100EAtom C3508
Socket
BGA1364
FCBGA1310
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR4-1866+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
256 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-4100E) / not specified (Atom C3508). The Core i3-4100E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Atom C3508 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4100E rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureCore i3-4100EAtom C3508
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded