
Core i3-4100E

Phenom X4 9600B
Core i3-4100E vs Phenom X4 9600B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4100E vs Phenom X4 9600B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4100E vs Phenom X4 9600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4100E
2013Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $53 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 6.6 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Phenom X4 9600B needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
Phenom X4 9600B
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,842 vs 1,848).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($278 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4100E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4100E better than Phenom X4 9600B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4100E vs Phenom X4 9600B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4100E
The Core i3-4100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,848 points. Launch price was $225.

Phenom X4 9600B
The Phenom X4 9600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4100E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X4 9600B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4100E versus 2.3 GHz on the Phenom X4 9600B — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-4100E. The Core i3-4100E uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9600B uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4100E scores 1,848 against the Phenom X4 9600B's 1,842 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-4100E. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4100E vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9600B.
| Feature | Core i3-4100E | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+4% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total)+50% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,848 | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 550 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4100E uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9600B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100E versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9600B — the Core i3-4100E supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4100E) vs 0 (Phenom X4 9600B) — the Core i3-4100E offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-4100E | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600+50% | DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-4100E) vs AMD-V (Phenom X4 9600B). The Core i3-4100E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Phenom X4 9600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100E targets Embedded, Phenom X4 9600B targets Business. Direct competitor: Core i3-4100E rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i3-4100E | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Embedded | Business |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4100E was priced at $225, while the Phenom X4 9600B came in at $278. On launch pricing ($225 vs $278), Core i3-4100E was $53 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4100E delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 6.6 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9600B — making the Core i3-4100E the 21.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4100E | Phenom X4 9600B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-19% | $278 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+24% | 6.6 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















