Atom x7-E3950 vs Core i3-4100E

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-E3950 vs Core i3-4100E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-E3950 vs Core i3-4100E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-E3950

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 12W instead of 512W, a 500W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4100E

2013

Why buy it

✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x7-E3950 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,848 vs 1,864).
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Atom x7-E3950 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4166.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 12W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7-E3950 better than Core i3-4100E?

Yes. Atom x7-E3950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x7-E3950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7-E3950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7-E3950 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom x7-E3950 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4100E only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-E3950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x7-E3950 vs Core i3-4100E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-E3950

The Atom x7-E3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,864 points. Launch price was $57.

Core i3-4100E

The Core i3-4100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,848 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7-E3950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4100E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-E3950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom x7-E3950 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4100E — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-4100E (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Atom x7-E3950 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4100E uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-E3950 scores 1,864 against the Core i3-4100E's 1,848 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x7-E3950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 245 vs 550, a 76.7% lead for the Core i3-4100E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x7-E3950 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4100E.

Feature	Atom x7-E3950	Core i3-4100E
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.4 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,864	1,848
Geekbench 6 Single	245	550+124%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-E3950 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4100E uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-2400 on the Atom x7-E3950 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100E — the Atom x7-E3950 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4100E supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Atom x7-E3950) vs 2 (Core i3-4100E). PCIe lanes: 6 (Atom x7-E3950) vs 16 (Core i3-4100E) — the Core i3-4100E offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apollo Lake (Atom x7-E3950) and QM87,HM86,HM87 (Core i3-4100E).

Feature	Atom x7-E3950	Core i3-4100E
Socket	FCBGA1296	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-2400+50%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	4+100%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	6	16+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7-E3950) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-4100E). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 505 (Atom x7-E3950) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4100E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4100E rivals Embedded R-Series.