Atom x7-E3950 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-E3950 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-E3950 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-E3950

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 12W instead of 512W, a 500W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 505, while Pentium Gold 4425Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium Gold 4425Y

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x7-E3950 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,854 vs 1,864).
❌4166.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 12W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7-E3950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7-E3950 better than Pentium Gold 4425Y?

Yes. Atom x7-E3950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x7-E3950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7-E3950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7-E3950 still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7-E3950 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Gold 4425Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x7-E3950 vs Pentium Gold 4425Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-E3950

The Atom x7-E3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,864 points. Launch price was $57.

Pentium Gold 4425Y

The Pentium Gold 4425Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,854 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7-E3950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Gold 4425Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-E3950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom x7-E3950 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium Gold 4425Y — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Atom x7-E3950 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Atom x7-E3950 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Gold 4425Y uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-E3950 scores 1,864 against the Pentium Gold 4425Y's 1,854 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom x7-E3950. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x7-E3950 vs 2 MB on the Pentium Gold 4425Y.

Feature	Atom x7-E3950	Pentium Gold 4425Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+300%	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,864	1,854
Geekbench 6 Single	245	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-E3950 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold 4425Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7-E3950	Pentium Gold 4425Y
Socket	FCBGA1296	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7-E3950) / not specified (Pentium Gold 4425Y). The Atom x7-E3950 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 505), while the Pentium Gold 4425Y requires a dedicated GPU.