Atom x7-E3950
VS
Core i3-4030U

Atom x7-E3950 vs Core i3-4030U

Intel

Atom x7-E3950

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 2 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i3-4030U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7-E3950 is positioned at rank 480 and the Core i3-4030U is on rank 75, so the Core i3-4030U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7-E3950

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#467
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
630%
#468
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
620%
#469
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
570%
#470
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
567%
#471
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
562%
#473
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
542%
#474
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
520%
#475
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
519%
#476
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
505%
#480
Atom x7-E3950
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#487
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4030U

#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#63
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
235%
#64
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
231%
#65
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
212%
#66
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
211%
#67
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
209%
#69
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
202%
#70
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
194%
#71
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
193%
#72
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
188%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
100%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
97%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom x7-E3950 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4030U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom x7-E3950Core i3-4030U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom x7-E3950Core i3-4030U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7-E3950 and Core i3-4030U

Intel

Atom x7-E3950

The Atom x7-E3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,864 points. Launch price was $57.

Intel

Core i3-4030U

The Core i3-4030U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Atom x7-E3950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4030U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-E3950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom x7-E3950 versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4030U — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Atom x7-E3950 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Atom x7-E3950 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4030U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-E3950 scores 1,864 against the Core i3-4030U's 1,876 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-4030U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x7-E3950 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4030U.

FeatureAtom x7-E3950Core i3-4030U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz+5%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.9 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+300%
512 kB
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,864
1,876
Geekbench 6 Single
245
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-E3950 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4030U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom x7-E3950Core i3-4030U
Socket
FCBGA1296
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7-E3950) / not specified (Core i3-4030U). The Atom x7-E3950 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 505), while the Core i3-4030U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom x7-E3950Core i3-4030U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 505
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d