Atom x7-E3950 vs V-Series V120

Atom x7-E3950 vs V-Series V120 Performance Spectrum

Atom x7-E3950

4 / 4

1,864

0.0%

1,874

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-E3950 vs V-Series V120 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-E3950 vs V-Series V120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-E3950

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 12W instead of 512W, a 500W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 505, while V-Series V120 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,864 vs 1,874).

V-Series V120

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌4166.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 12W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7-E3950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is V-Series V120 better than Atom x7-E3950?

Yes. V-Series V120 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, V-Series V120 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V120 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

V-Series V120 still makes the most sense overall. V-Series V120 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-E3950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x7-E3950 vs V-Series V120 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-E3950

The Atom x7-E3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,864 points. Launch price was $57.

V-Series V120

The V-Series V120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,874 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7-E3950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V120 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom x7-E3950 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom x7-E3950 versus 2.2 GHz on the V-Series V120 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the V-Series V120. The Atom x7-E3950 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the V-Series V120 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-E3950 scores 1,864 against the V-Series V120's 1,874 — a 0.5% lead for the V-Series V120.

Feature	Atom x7-E3950	V-Series V120
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+300%	512 kB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,864	1,874
Geekbench 6 Single	245	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-E3950 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the V-Series V120 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7-E3950	V-Series V120
Socket	FCBGA1296	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7-E3950) / not specified (V-Series V120). The Atom x7-E3950 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 505), while the V-Series V120 requires a dedicated GPU.