Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM

Intel

Core i3-4100E

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-740QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4100E

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $153 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Delivers 68.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-740QM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Core i7-740QM

2010

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,842 vs 1,848).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4100E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4100E better than Core i7-740QM?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-740QM is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4100E pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i7-740QM also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4100E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-4100E is the better buy right now. Core i3-4100E comes in $153 cheaper on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-740QM is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 68.5% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 4.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4100E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-4100E

The Core i3-4100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,848 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Core i7-740QM

The Core i7-740QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $546.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4100E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-740QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-740QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4100E versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-740QM — a 19.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-740QM (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Core i3-4100E uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-740QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4100E scores 1,848 against the Core i7-740QM's 1,842 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-4100E. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4100E vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-740QM.

FeatureCore i3-4100ECore i7-740QM
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.93 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+39%
1.73 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
1,848
1,842
Geekbench 6 Single
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4100E uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-740QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100E versus 1333 on the Core i7-740QM — the Core i3-4100E supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4100E supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: QM87,HM86,HM87 (Core i3-4100E) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-740QM).

FeatureCore i3-4100ECore i7-740QM
Socket
BGA1364
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600+20%
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-4100E) vs true (Core i7-740QM). The Core i3-4100E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-740QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4100E rivals Embedded R-Series; Core i7-740QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.

FeatureCore i3-4100ECore i7-740QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4100E was priced at $225, while the Core i7-740QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($225 vs $378), Core i3-4100E was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4100E delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-740QM — making the Core i3-4100E the 51.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-4100ECore i7-740QM
MSRP
$225-40%
$378
Performance per Dollar
8.2+67%
4.9
Release Date
2013
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.