
Core i3-4100E

Core i7-740QM
Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4100E
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-740QM needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
Core i7-740QM
2010Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,842 vs 1,848).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4100E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4100E better than Core i7-740QM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4100E vs Core i7-740QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4100E
The Core i3-4100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,848 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i7-740QM
The Core i7-740QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $546.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4100E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-740QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-740QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4100E versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-740QM — a 19.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-740QM (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Core i3-4100E uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-740QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4100E scores 1,848 against the Core i7-740QM's 1,842 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-4100E. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4100E vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-740QM.
| Feature | Core i3-4100E | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.93 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+39% | 1.73 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Clarksfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,848 | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 550 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4100E uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-740QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100E versus 1333 on the Core i7-740QM — the Core i3-4100E supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4100E supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: QM87,HM86,HM87 (Core i3-4100E) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-740QM).
| Feature | Core i3-4100E | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600+20% | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-4100E) vs true (Core i7-740QM). The Core i3-4100E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-740QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4100E rivals Embedded R-Series; Core i7-740QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.
| Feature | Core i3-4100E | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4100E was priced at $225, while the Core i7-740QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($225 vs $378), Core i3-4100E was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4100E delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-740QM — making the Core i3-4100E the 51.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4100E | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-40% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+67% | 4.9 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














