Core i3-4130 vs Xeon X5570

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4130 vs Xeon X5570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4130 vs Xeon X5570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4130

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Xeon X5570 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X5570.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5570 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5570, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Xeon X5570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5570

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,306 vs 3,334).
❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4130 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4130 better than Xeon X5570?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5570 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4130 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4130 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $117 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X5570 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (28.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4130 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4130 vs Xeon X5570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4130

The Core i3-4130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,334 points. Launch price was $120.

Xeon X5570

The Xeon X5570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,306 points. Launch price was $49.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4130 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X5570 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon X5570 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-4130 versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5570 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-4130 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i3-4130 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5570 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4130 scores 3,334 against the Xeon X5570's 3,306 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-4130. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4130 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X5570.

Feature	Core i3-4130	Xeon X5570
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+2%	3.33 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+16%	2.93 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,334	3,306
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,036	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,046	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4130 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4130 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5570 — the Core i3-4130 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-4130) vs 3 (Xeon X5570). Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4130) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5570).

Feature	Core i3-4130	Xeon X5570
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i3-4130) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5570). The Core i3-4130 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Xeon X5570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4130 targets Budget, Xeon X5570 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i3-4130 rivals FX-4130; Xeon X5570 rivals Core i3-2100.