Core i3-4158U
VS
Opteron 3320 EE

Core i3-4158U vs Opteron 3320 EE

Intel

Core i3-4158U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Opteron 3320 EE

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4158U is positioned at rank 576 and the Opteron 3320 EE is on rank 282, so the Opteron 3320 EE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4158U

#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
100%
#564
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
764%
#565
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
752%
#566
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
691%
#567
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
688%
#568
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
681%
#570
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
658%
#571
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
631%
#572
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
630%
#573
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
613%
#576
Core i3-4158U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3320 EE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
818%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
727%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
562%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
99%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
98%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
98%
#282
Opteron 3320 EE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#283
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
100%
#293
Xeon E5-2643 v3
MSRP: $219|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron 3320 EE leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4158U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-4158UOpteron 3320 EE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4158UOpteron 3320 EE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4158U and Opteron 3320 EE

Intel

Core i3-4158U

The Core i3-4158U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,921 points. Launch price was $315.

AMD

Opteron 3320 EE

The Opteron 3320 EE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,918 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4158U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 3320 EE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3320 EE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-4158U versus 2.5 GHz on the Opteron 3320 EE — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 3320 EE (base: 2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i3-4158U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 3320 EE uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4158U scores 1,921 against the Opteron 3320 EE's 1,918 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-4158U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4158U vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3320 EE.

FeatureCore i3-4158UOpteron 3320 EE
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.5 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2 GHz+5%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,921
1,918
Geekbench 6 Single
457
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4158U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3320 EE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4158UOpteron 3320 EE
Socket
FCBGA1168
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-4158U) / not specified (Opteron 3320 EE). The Core i3-4158U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 5100), while the Opteron 3320 EE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4158U targets Multimedia.

FeatureCore i3-4158UOpteron 3320 EE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Multimedia