Core i3-4158U vs PRO A6-8570

Core i3-4158U vs PRO A6-8570 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4158U

2 / 4

1,921

+0.1%

1,919

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4158U vs PRO A6-8570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4158U vs PRO A6-8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4158U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Graphics 5100, while PRO A6-8570 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

PRO A6-8570

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,919 vs 1,921).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4158U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A6-8570 better than Core i3-4158U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A6-8570 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4158U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4158U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A6-8570 still makes the most sense overall. PRO A6-8570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-8570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4158U vs PRO A6-8570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4158U

The Core i3-4158U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,921 points. Launch price was $315.

PRO A6-8570

The PRO A6-8570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,919 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4158U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the PRO A6-8570's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-4158U versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A6-8570 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-4158U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the PRO A6-8570 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4158U scores 1,921 against the PRO A6-8570's 1,919 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-4158U.

Feature	Core i3-4158U	PRO A6-8570
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3.8 GHz+90%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	1,921	1,919
Geekbench 6 Single	457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4158U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A6-8570 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4158U	PRO A6-8570
Socket	FCBGA1168	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-4158U) / not specified (PRO A6-8570). The Core i3-4158U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 5100), while the PRO A6-8570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4158U targets Multimedia.