Core i3-4158U vs Opteron X2170

Core i3-4158U vs Opteron X2170 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4158U

2 / 4

1,921

+0.5%

1,911

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4158U vs Opteron X2170 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4158U vs Opteron X2170: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4158U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Graphics 5100, while Opteron X2170 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron X2170, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.

Opteron X2170

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,911 vs 1,921).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4158U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron X2170 better than Core i3-4158U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron X2170 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4158U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4158U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron X2170 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron X2170 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X2170 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4158U vs Opteron X2170 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4158U

The Core i3-4158U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,921 points. Launch price was $315.

Opteron X2170

The Opteron X2170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Steppe Eagle (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,911 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4158U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron X2170 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron X2170 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-4158U versus 2.4 GHz on the Opteron X2170 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Opteron X2170 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-4158U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron X2170 uses Steppe Eagle (2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4158U scores 1,921 against the Opteron X2170's 1,911 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-4158U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4158U vs 0 kB on the Opteron X2170.

Feature	Core i3-4158U	Opteron X2170
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Steppe Eagle (2016)
PassMark	1,921	1,911
Geekbench 6 Single	457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4158U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron X2170 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4158U	Opteron X2170
Socket	FCBGA1168	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-4158U) / not specified (Opteron X2170). The Core i3-4158U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 5100), while the Opteron X2170 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4158U targets Multimedia.