Core i3-4158U
VS
Opteron X2170

Core i3-4158U vs Opteron X2170

Intel

Core i3-4158U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Opteron X2170

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4158U is positioned at rank 576 and the Opteron X2170 is on rank 285, so the Opteron X2170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4158U

#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
100%
#564
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
764%
#565
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
752%
#566
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
691%
#567
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
688%
#568
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
681%
#570
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
658%
#571
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
631%
#572
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
630%
#573
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
613%
#576
Core i3-4158U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron X2170

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4350%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
821%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
730%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
564%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
100%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
99%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
98%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
97%
#285
Opteron X2170
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#293
Xeon E5-2643 v3
MSRP: $219|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron X2170 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4158U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-4158UOpteron X2170
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Steppe Eagle (2016) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4158UOpteron X2170
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4158U and Opteron X2170

Intel

Core i3-4158U

The Core i3-4158U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,921 points. Launch price was $315.

AMD

Opteron X2170

The Opteron X2170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Steppe Eagle (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,911 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4158U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron X2170 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron X2170 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-4158U versus 2.4 GHz on the Opteron X2170 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Opteron X2170 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-4158U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron X2170 uses Steppe Eagle (2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4158U scores 1,921 against the Opteron X2170's 1,911 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-4158U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4158U vs 0 kB on the Opteron X2170.

FeatureCore i3-4158UOpteron X2170
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Steppe Eagle (2016)
PassMark
1,921
1,911
Geekbench 6 Single
457
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4158U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron X2170 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4158UOpteron X2170
Socket
FCBGA1168
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-4158U) / not specified (Opteron X2170). The Core i3-4158U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 5100), while the Opteron X2170 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4158U targets Multimedia.

FeatureCore i3-4158UOpteron X2170
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Multimedia