Core i3-4158U vs V-Series V140

Intel

Core i3-4158U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

V-Series V140

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4158U vs V-Series V140 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4158U vs V-Series V140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4158U vs V-Series V140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4158U

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Graphics 5100, while V-Series V140 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

V-Series V140

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,913 vs 1,921).
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4158U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i3-4158U better than V-Series V140?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, V-Series V140 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4158U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4158U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i3-4158U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4158U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-4158U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i3-4158U vs V-Series V140 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-4158U

    The Core i3-4158U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,921 points. Launch price was $315.

    AMD

    V-Series V140

    The V-Series V140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,913 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Core i3-4158U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V140 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i3-4158U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-4158U versus 2.3 GHz on the V-Series V140 — a 14% clock advantage for the V-Series V140. The Core i3-4158U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the V-Series V140 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4158U scores 1,921 against the V-Series V140's 1,913 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4158U.

    FeatureCore i3-4158UV-Series V140
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4+100%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz
    2.3 GHz+15%
    Base Clock
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    512 kB+100%
    Process
    22 nm-51%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    Champlain (2010−2011)
    PassMark
    1,921
    1,913
    Geekbench 6 Single
    457
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i3-4158U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the V-Series V140 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i3-4158UV-Series V140
    Socket
    FCBGA1168
    S1
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3L-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    12
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i3-4158U) / not specified (V-Series V140). The Core i3-4158U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 5100), while the V-Series V140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4158U targets Multimedia.

    FeatureCore i3-4158UV-Series V140
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel Iris Graphics 5100
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x / VT-d / EPT
    Target Use
    Multimedia