
Core i3-4170T

Xeon Gold 6262V
Core i3-4170T vs Xeon Gold 6262V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4170T vs Xeon Gold 6262V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4170T vs Xeon Gold 6262V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4170T
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while Xeon Gold 6262V needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Xeon Gold 6262V.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6262V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,133 vs 3,155).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6262V, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6262V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6262V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1000% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4170T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4170T.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6262V better than Core i3-4170T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4170T vs Xeon Gold 6262V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4170T
The Core i3-4170T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,133 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Gold 6262V
The Xeon Gold 6262V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,155 points. Launch price was $2,900.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4170T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6262V offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262V has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4170T versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262V — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6262V (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i3-4170T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4170T scores 3,133 against the Xeon Gold 6262V's 3,155 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6262V. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4170T vs 33 MB on the Xeon Gold 6262V.
| Feature | Core i3-4170T | Xeon Gold 6262V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 24 / 48+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+68% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 33 MB+1000% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 24 MB+9500% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,133 | 3,155 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4170T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6262V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4170T | Xeon Gold 6262V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4170T) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6262V). The Core i3-4170T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4400), while the Xeon Gold 6262V requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4170T targets Low Power Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-4170T | Xeon Gold 6262V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














