Core i3-4170T vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

CPU

GPU

Core i3-4170T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 Cores4 Thrd8 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-4170T vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4170T

2 / 4

3,133

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 / 4

3,142

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4170T vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4170T vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4170T

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4400, while Ryzen Embedded R1305G needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,133 vs 3,142).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4170T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 26.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4170T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4170T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R1305G better than Core i3-4170T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4170T is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1305G pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Ryzen Embedded R1305G also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen Embedded R1305G comes in 28.2% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Core i3-4170T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 27.8% better value on paper (26.8 vs 20.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4170T vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4170T

The Core i3-4170T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,133 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Embedded R1305G share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4170T versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-4170T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i3-4170T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4170T scores 3,133 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4170T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

Feature	Core i3-4170T	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+14%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+113%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,133	3,142
Geekbench 6 Single	800	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4170T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4170T	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Socket	LGA1150	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4170T) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1305G). The Core i3-4170T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4400), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4170T targets Low Power Desktop.

Feature	Core i3-4170T	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4400	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4170T was priced at $117, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G came in at $150. On launch pricing ($117 vs $150), Core i3-4170T was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4170T delivers 26.8 pts/$ vs 20.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — making the Core i3-4170T the 24.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4170T	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP	$117-22%	$150
Performance per Dollar	26.8+28%	20.9
Release Date	2015	2020

Search Core i3-4170T on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded R1305G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.