Core i3-4330 vs Core i3-7100H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4330 vs Core i3-7100H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4330 vs Core i3-7100H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4330

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Core i3-7100H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

Core i3-7100H

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,450 vs 3,482).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4330 better than Core i3-7100H?

Yes. Core i3-4330 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4330 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4330 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4330 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7100H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4330 vs Core i3-7100H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4330

The Core i3-4330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,482 points. Launch price was $171.

Core i3-7100H

The Core i3-7100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,450 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4330 and Core i3-7100H share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4330 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7100H — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-4330 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-4330 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-7100H uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4330 scores 3,482 against the Core i3-7100H's 3,450 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-4330. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100H.

Feature	Core i3-4330	Core i3-7100H
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+17%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Kaby Lake-H (2017)
PassMark	3,482	3,450
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,011

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4330 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7100H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100H — the Core i3-7100H supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100H supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-4330	Core i3-7100H
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4330) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100H). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4330) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330 targets Desktop, Core i3-7100H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7100H rivals Ryzen 3 2300U.

Feature	Core i3-4330	Core i3-7100H
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Desktop	Performance Laptop