Core i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1075T

CPU

GPU

Core i3-4330

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Phenom II X6 1075T

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1075T Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4330

2 / 4

3,482

0.0%

3,500

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1075T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1075T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4330

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
✅Delivers 76.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 125W, a 71W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Phenom II X6 1075T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,482 vs 3,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.

Phenom II X6 1075T

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4330.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌131.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4330 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4330 better than Phenom II X6 1075T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4330 is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1075T pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Phenom II X6 1075T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X6 1075T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4330 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4330 comes in $107 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $245 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Phenom II X6 1075T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 76.6% better value on MSRP (25.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4330 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1075T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4330

The Core i3-4330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,482 points. Launch price was $171.

Phenom II X6 1075T

The Phenom II X6 1075T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $260.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4330 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1075T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1075T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4330 versus 3.5 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1075T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-4330 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1075T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4330 scores 3,482 against the Phenom II X6 1075T's 3,500 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom II X6 1075T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1075T.

Feature	Core i3-4330	Phenom II X6 1075T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+17%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Thuban (2010)
PassMark	3,482	3,500
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,896
Geekbench 6 Single	—	679
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,960

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4330 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1075T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330 versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X6 1075T — the Core i3-4330 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-4330	Phenom II X6 1075T
Socket	LGA1150	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Phenom II X6 1075T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4330) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1075T). The Core i3-4330 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Phenom II X6 1075T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330 targets Desktop, Phenom II X6 1075T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Phenom II X6 1075T rivals Core i5-750.

Feature	Core i3-4330	Phenom II X6 1075T
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4330 was priced at $138, while the Phenom II X6 1075T came in at $245. On launch pricing ($138 vs $245), Core i3-4330 was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4330 delivers 25.2 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Phenom II X6 1075T — making the Core i3-4330 the 55.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4330	Phenom II X6 1075T
MSRP	$138-44%	$245
Performance per Dollar	25.2+76%	14.3
Release Date	2013	2010

Search Core i3-4330 on Amazon

Search Phenom II X6 1075T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.