Core i3-5157U
VS
Celeron G5920

Core i3-5157U vs Celeron G5920

Intel

Core i3-5157U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Celeron G5920

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-5157U is positioned at rank #663 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-5157U

#651
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
905%
#652
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
892%
#653
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
819%
#654
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
815%
#655
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
808%
#657
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
780%
#658
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
748%
#659
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
747%
#660
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
727%
#663
Core i3-5157U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
99%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5920

#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
104%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
34%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
104%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
103%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
103%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
103%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
103%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
103%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
102%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
102%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
102%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
102%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
101%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
26%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
101%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
23%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
100%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
100%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
21%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
100%
#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
99%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
21%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
16%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
99%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
99%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
98%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
97%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G5920 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-5157UCeleron G5920
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-5157U (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-5157UCeleron G5920
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-5157U and Celeron G5920

Intel

Core i3-5157U

The Core i3-5157U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,593 points. Launch price was $315.

Intel

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-5157U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G5920's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core i3-5157U versus 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G5920 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-5157U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G5920 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-5157U scores 2,593 against the Celeron G5920's 2,577 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-5157U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 793 vs 756, a 4.8% lead for the Core i3-5157U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-5157U vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920.

FeatureCore i3-5157UCeleron G5920
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+40%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
2,593
2,577
Geekbench 6 Single
793+5%
756
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,248
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-5157U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5920 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i3-5157U versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5920 — the Celeron G5920 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5920 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-5157U) vs 16 (Celeron G5920) — the Celeron G5920 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-5157UCeleron G5920
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866
DDR4-2666+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-5157U) vs VT-x (Celeron G5920). Both include integrated graphics Iris Graphics 6100 (Core i3-5157U) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5920) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-5157U targets Premium Laptop, Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-5157U rivals A12-8800B; Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.

FeatureCore i3-5157UCeleron G5920
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Graphics 6100
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Premium Laptop
Budget