Core i3-550
VS
A8-3510MX

Core i3-550 vs A8-3510MX

Intel

Core i3-550

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A8-3510MX

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-550 is positioned at rank 965 and the A8-3510MX is on rank 754, so the A8-3510MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26350%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24898%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18078%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5446%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4314%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3774%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2161%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2133%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1942%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1942%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1869%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1843%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1835%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1818%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
100%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
100%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
99%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
99%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
98%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
98%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
98%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
96%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
94%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
93%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
93%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3510MX

#742
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1079%
#743
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1064%
#744
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
976%
#745
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
972%
#746
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
963%
#748
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
930%
#749
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
892%
#750
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
890%
#751
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
866%
#754
A8-3510MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#761
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-550 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A8-3510MX in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-550A8-3510MX
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-550A8-3510MX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-550 and A8-3510MX

Intel

Core i3-550

The Core i3-550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,632 points. Launch price was $101.

AMD

A8-3510MX

The A8-3510MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,631 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i3-550 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-3510MX offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3510MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-550 versus 2.5 GHz on the A8-3510MX — a 24.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-550 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-550 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A8-3510MX uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-550 scores 1,632 against the A8-3510MX's 1,631 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-550. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 437 vs 252, a 53.7% lead for the Core i3-550 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-550 vs 0 kB on the A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i3-550A8-3510MX
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+28%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+78%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,632
1,631
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,320
Geekbench 6 Single
437+73%
252
Geekbench 6 Multi
899
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-550 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-3510MX uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-550) vs 20 (A8-3510MX) — the A8-3510MX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-550A8-3510MX
Socket
LGA1156
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-550) vs AMD-V (A8-3510MX). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Core i3-550) and Radeon HD 6620G (A8-3510MX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3510MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3510MX rivals Core i5-2410M.

FeatureCore i3-550A8-3510MX
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Radeon HD 6620G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop