Core i3-550
VS
A8-7100

Core i3-550 vs A8-7100

Intel

Core i3-550

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A8-7100

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-550 is positioned at rank 965 and the A8-7100 is on rank 746, so the A8-7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26350%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24898%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18078%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5446%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4314%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3774%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2161%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2133%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1942%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1942%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1869%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1843%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1835%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1818%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
100%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
100%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
99%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
99%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
98%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
98%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
98%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
96%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
94%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
93%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
93%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7100

#734
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1069%
#735
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1053%
#736
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
967%
#737
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
962%
#738
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
954%
#740
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
921%
#741
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
883%
#742
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
882%
#743
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
858%
#746
A8-7100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#748
Ryzen 3 7320C
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
100%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
#761
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-550 leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-7100 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-550A8-7100
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-550A8-7100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-550 and A8-7100

Intel

Core i3-550

The Core i3-550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,632 points. Launch price was $101.

AMD

A8-7100

The A8-7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,647 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i3-550 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-7100 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-550 versus 3 GHz on the A8-7100 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-550 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-550 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A8-7100 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-550 scores 1,632 against the A8-7100's 1,647 — a 0.9% lead for the A8-7100.

FeatureCore i3-550A8-7100
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+78%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
1,632
1,647
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,320
Geekbench 6 Single
437
Geekbench 6 Multi
899
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-550 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-7100 uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-550 versus 1600 on the A8-7100 — the A8-7100 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H55,H57,P55,Q57 (Core i3-550) and FP3 (A8-7100).

FeatureCore i3-550A8-7100
Socket
LGA1156
FP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+104857500%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-550) vs true (A8-7100). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Core i3-550) and Radeon R5 Graphics (A8-7100) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7100 rivals Core i3-4010U.

FeatureCore i3-550A8-7100
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
true