Core i3-560
VS
A8-3510MX

Core i3-560 vs A8-3510MX

Intel

Core i3-560

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.33 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A8-3510MX

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-560 is positioned at rank 964 and the A8-3510MX is on rank 754, so the A8-3510MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-560

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26195%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24751%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17971%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5414%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4288%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3752%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2149%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2121%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1931%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1931%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1909%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1858%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1832%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1824%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1808%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
100%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
99%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
99%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
99%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
98%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
98%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
98%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
97%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
97%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
95%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
94%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
93%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3510MX

#742
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1079%
#743
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1064%
#744
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
976%
#745
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
972%
#746
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
963%
#748
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
930%
#749
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
892%
#750
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
890%
#751
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
866%
#754
A8-3510MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#761
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-3510MX leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-560 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-560A8-3510MX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-560A8-3510MX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-560 and A8-3510MX

Intel

Core i3-560

The Core i3-560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,642 points. Launch price was $190.

AMD

A8-3510MX

The A8-3510MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,631 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i3-560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-3510MX offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3510MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.33 GHz on the Core i3-560 versus 2.5 GHz on the A8-3510MX — a 153.4% clock advantage for the A8-3510MX (base: 3.33 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-560 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A8-3510MX uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-560 scores 1,642 against the A8-3510MX's 1,631 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-560. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-560 vs 0 kB on the A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i3-560A8-3510MX
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
0.33 GHz
2.5 GHz+658%
Base Clock
3.33 GHz+85%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,642
1,631
Geekbench 6 Single
252
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-560 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-3510MX uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-560A8-3510MX
Socket
LGA1156
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-560) / AMD-V (A8-3510MX). The A8-3510MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Core i3-560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3510MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3510MX rivals Core i5-2410M.

FeatureCore i3-560A8-3510MX
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6620G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop