Core i3-560
VS
Core M-5Y10

Core i3-560 vs Core M-5Y10

Intel

Core i3-560

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.33 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core M-5Y10

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-560 is positioned at rank 964 and the Core M-5Y10 is on rank 1190, so the Core i3-560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-560

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26195%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24751%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17971%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5414%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4288%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3752%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2149%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2121%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1931%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1931%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1909%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1858%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1832%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1824%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1808%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
100%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
99%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
99%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
99%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
98%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
98%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
98%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
97%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
97%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
95%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
94%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
93%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y10

#1178
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5015%
#1179
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4942%
#1180
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4537%
#1181
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4516%
#1182
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4475%
#1184
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4321%
#1185
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4144%
#1186
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4137%
#1187
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4026%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
100%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
96%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
96%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
91%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
90%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
90%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
90%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
87%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
87%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core M-5Y10 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-560 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-560Core M-5Y10
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core i3-560 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $20), it costs 50% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 100% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core M-5Y10.
InsightCore i3-560Core M-5Y10
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+100%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-560 and Core M-5Y10

Intel

Core i3-560

The Core i3-560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,642 points. Launch price was $190.

Intel

Core M-5Y10

The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-560 and Core M-5Y10 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.33 GHz on the Core i3-560 versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 — a 143.3% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y10 (base: 3.33 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Core i3-560 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core M-5Y10 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-560 scores 1,642 against the Core M-5Y10's 1,644 — a 0.1% lead for the Core M-5Y10. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-560Core M-5Y10
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
0.33 GHz
2 GHz+506%
Base Clock
3.33 GHz+316%
0.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark
1,642
1,644
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-560 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y10 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-560Core M-5Y10
Socket
LGA1156
FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-560 launched at $138 MSRP, while the Core M-5Y10 debuted at $281. At current prices ($10 vs $20), the Core i3-560 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-560 delivers 164.2 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y10 — making the Core i3-560 the 66.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-560Core M-5Y10
MSRP
$138-51%
$281
Avg Price (30d)
$10-50%
$20
Performance per Dollar
164.2+100%
82.2
Release Date
2010
2014