A8-7100 vs Core i3-560

A8-7100 vs Core i3-560 Performance Spectrum

A8-7100

4 / 4

1,647

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-560

2 / 4

1,642

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7100 vs Core i3-560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7100 vs Core i3-560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7100

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 73W, a 69W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Core i3-560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-560

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,642 vs 1,647).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while A8-7100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1725% higher power demand at 73W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7100 better than Core i3-560?

Yes. A8-7100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7100 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-7100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-560 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7100 vs Core i3-560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7100

The A8-7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,647 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-560

The Core i3-560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,642 points. Launch price was $190.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-560 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-7100 versus 0.33 GHz on the Core i3-560 — a 160.4% clock advantage for the A8-7100 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The A8-7100 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-560 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7100 scores 1,647 against the Core i3-560's 1,642 — a 0.3% lead for the A8-7100.

Feature	A8-7100	Core i3-560
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+809%	0.33 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.33 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,647	1,642

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7100 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-560 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-7100	Core i3-560
Socket	FP3	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7100) / not specified (Core i3-560). The A8-7100 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core i3-560 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7100 rivals Core i3-4010U.