A8-7100 vs Pentium G2010

A8-7100 vs Pentium G2010 Performance Spectrum

A8-7100

4 / 4

1,647

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G2010

2 / 2

1,641

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7100 vs Pentium G2010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7100 vs Pentium G2010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7100

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 55W, a 51W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Pentium G2010 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium G2010

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,641 vs 1,647).
❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while A8-7100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1275% higher power demand at 55W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7100 better than Pentium G2010?

Yes. A8-7100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-7100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-7100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7100 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-7100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G2010 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (25.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-7100 vs Pentium G2010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7100

The A8-7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,647 points. Launch price was $90.

Pentium G2010

The Pentium G2010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,641 points. Launch price was $466.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G2010 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-7100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-7100 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G2010 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the A8-7100 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A8-7100 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium G2010 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7100 scores 1,647 against the Pentium G2010's 1,641 — a 0.4% lead for the A8-7100.

Feature	A8-7100	Pentium G2010
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+7%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	—	3072 kB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,647	1,641

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7100 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G2010 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-7100	Pentium G2010
Socket	FP3	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7100) / not specified (Pentium G2010). The A8-7100 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Pentium G2010 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7100 rivals Core i3-4010U.