A8-7100 vs Pentium G3220T

A8-7100 vs Pentium G3220T Performance Spectrum

A8-7100

4 / 4

1,647

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G3220T

2 / 2

1,649

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-7100 vs Pentium G3220T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-7100 vs Pentium G3220T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-7100

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Pentium G3220T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,647 vs 1,649).

Pentium G3220T

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $54 MSRP, while A8-7100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-7100 better than Pentium G3220T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-7100 is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3220T pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3220T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-7100 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-7100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $54 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G3220T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-7100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-7100 vs Pentium G3220T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-7100

The A8-7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,647 points. Launch price was $90.

Pentium G3220T

The Pentium G3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,649 points. Launch price was $40.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-7100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G3220T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-7100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-7100 versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium G3220T — a 14.3% clock advantage for the A8-7100 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A8-7100 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium G3220T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7100 scores 1,647 against the Pentium G3220T's 1,649 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium G3220T.

Feature	A8-7100	Pentium G3220T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+15%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,647	1,649

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7100 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3220T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-7100	Pentium G3220T
Socket	FP3	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-7100) / not specified (Pentium G3220T). The A8-7100 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Pentium G3220T requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7100 rivals Core i3-4010U.