A8-7100
VS
Athlon II X3 435

A8-7100 vs Athlon II X3 435

AMD

A8-7100

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 435

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-7100 is positioned at rank 746 and the Athlon II X3 435 is on rank 817, so the A8-7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7100

#734
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1069%
#735
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1053%
#736
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
967%
#737
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
962%
#738
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
954%
#740
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
921%
#741
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
883%
#742
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
882%
#743
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
858%
#746
A8-7100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#748
Ryzen 3 7320C
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
100%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
#761
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 435

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16484%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15576%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11309%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3407%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2699%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2361%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1352%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1335%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1215%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1215%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1201%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1169%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1153%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1148%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1138%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
100%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
100%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
99%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
98%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
98%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
98%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
97%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
97%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
97%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-7100 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon II X3 435 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-7100Athlon II X3 435
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-7100Athlon II X3 435
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-7100 and Athlon II X3 435

AMD

A8-7100

The A8-7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,647 points. Launch price was $90.

AMD

Athlon II X3 435

The Athlon II X3 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $160.

Processing Power

The A8-7100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 435 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A8-7100 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-7100 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X3 435 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the A8-7100 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A8-7100 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7100 scores 1,647 against the Athlon II X3 435's 1,645 — a 0.1% lead for the A8-7100.

FeatureA8-7100Athlon II X3 435
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+33%
3 / 3
Boost Clock
3 GHz+3%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+61%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,647
1,645
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7100 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 435 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-7100 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 435 — the A8-7100 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A8-7100) and AM3 (Athlon II X3 435).

FeatureA8-7100Athlon II X3 435
Socket
FP3
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+53233%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-7100) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X3 435). The A8-7100 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon II X3 435 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7100 rivals Core i3-4010U.

FeatureA8-7100Athlon II X3 435
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V