A8-7100
VS
Athlon 64 FX-74

A8-7100 vs Athlon 64 FX-74

AMD

A8-7100

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-7100 is positioned at rank 746 and the Athlon 64 FX-74 is on rank 1087, so the A8-7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7100

#734
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1069%
#735
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1053%
#736
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
967%
#737
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
962%
#738
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
954%
#740
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
921%
#741
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
883%
#742
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
882%
#743
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
858%
#746
A8-7100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#748
Ryzen 3 7320C
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
100%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
#761
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-74

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
93890%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
88717%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
64416%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19406%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15371%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13447%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7702%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7601%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6921%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6920%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6843%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6658%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6565%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6539%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6480%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
100%
#1088
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
99%
#1089
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
99%
#1090
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
98%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
97%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
93%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
91%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
85%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
79%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
71%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
69%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
68%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
65%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A8-7100 (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA8-7100Athlon 64 FX-74
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 FX-74 (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA8-7100Athlon 64 FX-74
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-7100 and Athlon 64 FX-74

AMD

A8-7100

The A8-7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,647 points. Launch price was $90.

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-74

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

Processing Power

The A8-7100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 FX-74 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-7100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-7100 versus 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 — identical boost frequencies. The A8-7100 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7100 scores 1,647 against the Athlon 64 FX-74's 1,658 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-74.

FeatureA8-7100Athlon 64 FX-74
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
4096 kB+300%
1 MB
Process
28 nm-69%
90 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,647
1,658
Geekbench 6 Single
400
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-7100 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 uses F (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-7100 versus DDR2 on the Athlon 64 FX-74 — the A8-7100 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A8-7100) and nForce 680a (Athlon 64 FX-74).

FeatureA8-7100Athlon 64 FX-74
Socket
FP3
F
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1600+79900%
DDR2
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 64 FX-74 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A8-7100) vs AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74). The A8-7100 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-7100 rivals Core i3-4010U; Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.

FeatureA8-7100Athlon 64 FX-74
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget