A10-4655M vs Core i3-560

A10-4655M vs Core i3-560 Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-560

2 / 4

1,642

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 73W, a 48W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7620G, while Core i3-560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-560

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,642 vs 1,654).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while A10-4655M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌192% higher power demand at 73W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4655M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4655M better than Core i3-560?

Yes. A10-4655M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-4655M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4655M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4655M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-4655M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-560 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4655M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-560

The Core i3-560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,642 points. Launch price was $190.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-560 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4655M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 0.33 GHz on the Core i3-560 — a 157.8% clock advantage for the A10-4655M (base: 2 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-560 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Core i3-560's 1,642 — a 0.7% lead for the A10-4655M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4655M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-560.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-560
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+748%	0.33 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.33 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,654	1,642

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-560 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-560
Socket	FP2	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-4655M) / not specified (Core i3-560). The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Core i3-560 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U.