Core i3-6006U
VS
Athlon II X4 638

Core i3-6006U vs Athlon II X4 638

Intel

Core i3-6006U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 2 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 638

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-6006U is positioned at rank 370 and the Athlon II X4 638 is on rank 1040, so the Core i3-6006U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6006U

#358
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
516%
#359
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
509%
#360
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
467%
#361
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
465%
#362
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
461%
#364
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
445%
#365
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
427%
#366
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
426%
#367
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
414%
#370
Core i3-6006U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 638

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41396%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
39116%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28401%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8556%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6777%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5929%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3396%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3351%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3052%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3051%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3017%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2936%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2895%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2883%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2857%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
100%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
100%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
95%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
94%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
93%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
92%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
91%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
91%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
90%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
90%
#1055
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X4 638 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-6006U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-6006UAthlon II X4 638
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($280)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-6006UAthlon II X4 638
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($280)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-6006U and Athlon II X4 638

Intel

Core i3-6006U

The Core i3-6006U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 November 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,273 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

Athlon II X4 638

The Athlon II X4 638 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,260 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i3-6006U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X4 638 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 638 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-6006U versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X4 638 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 638 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-6006U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon II X4 638 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6006U scores 2,273 against the Athlon II X4 638's 2,260 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-6006U. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6006U vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 638.

FeatureCore i3-6006UAthlon II X4 638
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.7 GHz+35%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,273
2,260
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,200
Geekbench 6 Single
630
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,313
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6006U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 638 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6006U versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 638 — the Core i3-6006U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X4 638 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-6006U) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 638) — the Athlon II X4 638 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-U (Core i3-6006U) and AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 638).

FeatureCore i3-6006UAthlon II X4 638
Socket
BGA1356
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-6006U) / not specified (Athlon II X4 638). The Core i3-6006U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 520), while the Athlon II X4 638 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6006U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i3-6006UAthlon II X4 638
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 520
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Mobile