Core i3-6006U vs E2-7110

Core i3-6006U vs E2-7110 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6006U

2 / 4

2,273

0.0%

Celeron 847

Core i3-530

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2,282

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6006U vs E2-7110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6006U vs E2-7110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6006U

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 520, while E2-7110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E2-7110 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,273 vs 2,282).

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6006U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-7110 better than Core i3-6006U?

Yes. E2-7110 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-7110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-7110 still makes the most sense overall. E2-7110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6006U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6006U vs E2-7110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6006U

The Core i3-6006U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 November 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,273 points. Launch price was $281.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6006U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the E2-7110 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-7110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-6006U versus 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-6006U. The Core i3-6006U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the E2-7110 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6006U scores 2,273 against the E2-7110's 2,282 — a 0.4% lead for the E2-7110.

Feature	Core i3-6006U	E2-7110
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark	2,273	2,282
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,200	—
Geekbench 6 Single	630	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,313	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6006U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-7110 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-6006U	E2-7110
Socket	BGA1356	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-6006U) / not specified (E2-7110). The Core i3-6006U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 520), while the E2-7110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6006U targets Mobile.