Core i3-6006U vs Turion II Ultra M660

Core i3-6006U vs Turion II Ultra M660 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6006U

2 / 4

2,273

0.0%

Celeron 847

Core i3-530

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2,278

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6006U vs Turion II Ultra M660 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6006U vs Turion II Ultra M660: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6006U

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 520, while Turion II Ultra M660 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,273 vs 2,278).
❌650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.

Turion II Ultra M660

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6006U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Ultra M660 better than Core i3-6006U?

Yes. Turion II Ultra M660 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion II Ultra M660 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Ultra M660 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Ultra M660 still makes the most sense overall. Turion II Ultra M660 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6006U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6006U vs Turion II Ultra M660 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6006U

The Core i3-6006U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 November 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,273 points. Launch price was $281.

Turion II Ultra M660

The Turion II Ultra M660 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 2,278 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6006U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion II Ultra M660's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i3-6006U versus 2.7 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M660 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Turion II Ultra M660. The Core i3-6006U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II Ultra M660 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6006U scores 2,273 against the Turion II Ultra M660's 2,278 — a 0.2% lead for the Turion II Ultra M660.

Feature	Core i3-6006U	Turion II Ultra M660
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	2,273	2,278
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,200	—
Geekbench 6 Single	630	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,313	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6006U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II Ultra M660 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6006U versus DDR2-800 on the Turion II Ultra M660 — the Core i3-6006U supports 166.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-6006U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-6006U) vs 0 (Turion II Ultra M660) — the Core i3-6006U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-6006U	Turion II Ultra M660
Socket	BGA1356	S1g3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+167%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-6006U) vs AMD-V (Turion II Ultra M660). The Core i3-6006U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 520), while the Turion II Ultra M660 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6006U targets Mobile, Turion II Ultra M660 targets Mobile.