Core i3-6100E vs FX-9830P

Core i3-6100E vs FX-9830P Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6100E

2 / 4

3,315

+0.5%

3,298

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6100E vs FX-9830P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6100E vs FX-9830P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6100E

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 530, while FX-9830P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9830P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

FX-9830P

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,298 vs 3,315).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6100E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9830P better than Core i3-6100E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-9830P is ahead with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6100E pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6100E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9830P is the better buy right now. FX-9830P comes in $75 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-6100E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 49.2% better value on MSRP (22.0 vs 14.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-9830P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6100E vs FX-9830P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6100E

The Core i3-6100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,315 points. Launch price was $225.

FX-9830P

The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-6100E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-9830P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9830P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100E versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P — a 31.3% clock advantage for the FX-9830P. The Core i3-6100E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-9830P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100E scores 3,315 against the FX-9830P's 3,298 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-6100E.

Feature	Core i3-6100E	FX-9830P
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.7 GHz+37%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (per module)+100%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,315	3,298

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-6100E) / not specified (FX-9830P). The Core i3-6100E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the FX-9830P requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i3-6100E	FX-9830P
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 530	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-6100E was priced at $225, while the FX-9830P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($225 vs $150), FX-9830P was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6100E delivers 14.7 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the FX-9830P — making the FX-9830P the 39.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-6100E	FX-9830P
MSRP	$225	$150-33%
Performance per Dollar	14.7	22.0+50%
Release Date	2015	2016

Search Core i3-6100E on Amazon

Search FX-9830P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.