Core i3-6100E
VS
Xeon X3480

Core i3-6100E vs Xeon X3480

Intel

Core i3-6100E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Xeon X3480

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.73 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-6100E is positioned at rank 902 and the Xeon X3480 is on rank 981, so the Core i3-6100E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6100E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21162%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14519%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4374%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3465%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3031%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1736%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1713%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1560%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1560%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1542%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1501%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1480%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1474%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1460%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
100%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
99%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
98%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
98%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
97%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
96%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
96%
#914
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
96%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
96%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3480

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
38203%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
7213%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6408%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4951%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
100%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
98%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
97%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
97%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
96%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
96%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
95%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
94%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
90%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
88%
#992
Xeon E5-2690
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
87%
#993
Xeon E3-1565L v5
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $120
87%
#994
Xeon L5640
MSRP: $996|Avg: N/A
86%
#995
Xeon E5-4627 v2
MSRP: $2061|Avg: $70
84%
#996
Xeon L5335
MSRP: $380|Avg: $18
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($48) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3480 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i3-6100EXeon X3480
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($48)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-6100E ($50), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($2 less, 4% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i3-6100EXeon X3480
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($48)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-6100E and Xeon X3480

Intel

Core i3-6100E

The Core i3-6100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,315 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Xeon X3480

The Xeon X3480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $612.

Processing Power

The Core i3-6100E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X3480 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon X3480 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100E versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X3480 — a 32% clock advantage for the Xeon X3480. The Core i3-6100E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X3480 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100E scores 3,315 against the Xeon X3480's 3,327 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X3480. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6100E vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3480.

FeatureCore i3-6100EXeon X3480
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.73 GHz+38%
Base Clock
3.06 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
8 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
3,315
3,327
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-6100E) / not specified (Xeon X3480). The Core i3-6100E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon X3480 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i3-6100EXeon X3480
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 530
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-6100E launched at $225 MSRP, while the Xeon X3480 debuted at $612. At current prices ($50 vs $48), the Xeon X3480 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6100E delivers 66.3 pts/$ vs 69.3 pts/$ for the Xeon X3480 — making the Xeon X3480 the 4.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-6100EXeon X3480
MSRP
$225-63%
$612
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$48-4%
Performance per Dollar
66.3
69.3+5%
Release Date
2015
2010