
Core i3-6320

Pentium 6805
Core i3-6320 vs Pentium 6805 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-6320 vs Pentium 6805 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-6320 vs Pentium 6805: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-6320
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 530, while Pentium 6805 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium 6805.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,421 vs 4,424).
- ❌240% higher power demand at 51W vs 15W.
Pentium 6805
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 51W, a 36W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-6320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌0.6% HIGHER MSRP$161 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6320 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-6320.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium 6805 better than Core i3-6320?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-6320 vs Pentium 6805 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6320
The Core i3-6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,421 points. Launch price was $157.

Pentium 6805
The Pentium 6805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 4,424 points. Launch price was $161.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-6320 and Pentium 6805 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-6320 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium 6805 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-6320 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i3-6320 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 6805 uses Ice Lake-Y (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6320 scores 4,421 against the Pentium 6805's 4,424 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium 6805. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-6320 | Pentium 6805 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+30% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+255% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Ice Lake-Y (2020) |
| PassMark | 4,421 | 4,424 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,853 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,311 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,730 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-6320 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 6805 uses FCBGA1526 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-6320 | Pentium 6805 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1526 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-6320) / not specified (Pentium 6805). The Core i3-6320 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Pentium 6805 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-6320 | Pentium 6805 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 530 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-6320 was priced at $160, while the Pentium 6805 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($160 vs $161), Core i3-6320 was $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6320 delivers 27.6 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Pentium 6805 — making the Core i3-6320 the 0.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-6320 | Pentium 6805 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $161 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6 | 27.5 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














