
Athlon 3000G
Popular choices:

Core i3-6320
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon 3000G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.7 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($49 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 51W, a 16W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (956 vs 1,311).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,800 vs 2,853).
Core i3-6320
2015Why buy it
- ✅+37.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 90.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌45.7% higher power demand at 51W vs 35W.
Athlon 3000G
2019Core i3-6320
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.7 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($49 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 51W, a 16W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (956 vs 1,311).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,800 vs 2,853).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 90.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌45.7% higher power demand at 51W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-6320 better than Athlon 3000G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 3000G and Core i3-6320

Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
The Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,446 points. Launch price was $49.

Core i3-6320
Core i3-6320
The Core i3-6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,421 points. Launch price was $157.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 3000G and Core i3-6320 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 3000G versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-6320 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-6320 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Athlon 3000G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-6320 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 3000G scores 4,446 against the Core i3-6320's 4,421 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon 3000G. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,800 vs 2,853 (45.3% advantage for the Core i3-6320). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 956 vs 1,311, a 31.3% lead for the Core i3-6320 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,970 vs 2,730 (32.3% advantage for the Core i3-6320). Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 4,446 | 4,421 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,800 | 2,853+59% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 956 | 1,311+37% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,970 | 2,730+39% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Athlon 3000G versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6320 — the Athlon 3000G supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM4 (Athlon 3000G) and H110,H170,Z170,Q170,Q150,B150,B250,H270,Z270,Q270,Q250 (Core i3-6320).
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+66550% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | 64 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Athlon 3000G) vs Yes (Core i3-6320). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Vega 3 Graphics (Athlon 3000G) and Intel HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6320) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 3000G rivals Pentium Gold G6400.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 3000G launched at $49 MSRP, while the Core i3-6320 debuted at $160. On MSRP ($49 vs $160), the Athlon 3000G is $111 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 3000G delivers 90.7 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Core i3-6320 — making the Athlon 3000G the 106.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-69% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.7+229% | 27.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













