
Athlon 3000G

Core i5-6442EQ
Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-6442EQ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-6442EQ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-6442EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 3000G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 406.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.7 vs 17.9 PassMark/$ ($49 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3 Graphics, while Core i5-6442EQ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,446 vs 4,483).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
Core i5-6442EQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 3000G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.9 vs 90.7 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 3000G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 3000G.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 3000G better than Core i5-6442EQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-6442EQ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 3000G
The Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,446 points. Launch price was $49.

Core i5-6442EQ
The Core i5-6442EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 4,483 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Athlon 3000G packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6442EQ offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-6442EQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 3000G versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-6442EQ — a 59.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 3000G. The Athlon 3000G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-6442EQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 3000G scores 4,446 against the Core i5-6442EQ's 4,483 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-6442EQ. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 3000G vs 6 MB on the Core i5-6442EQ.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+84% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 4,446 | 4,483 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 956 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,970 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon 3000G) / not specified (Core i5-6442EQ). The Athlon 3000G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3 Graphics), while the Core i5-6442EQ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 3000G rivals Pentium Gold G6400.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 3000G was priced at $49, while the Core i5-6442EQ came in at $250. On launch pricing ($49 vs $250), Athlon 3000G was $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 3000G delivers 90.7 pts/$ vs 17.9 pts/$ for the Core i5-6442EQ — making the Athlon 3000G the 134% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 3000G | Core i5-6442EQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-80% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.7+407% | 17.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















