Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-4670T

Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-4670T Performance Spectrum

Athlon 3000G

2 / 4

4,446

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Core i5-4670T

4 / 4

4,488

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-4670T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-4670T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 3000G

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 282.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.7 vs 23.7 PassMark/$ ($49 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3 Graphics, while Core i5-4670T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,446 vs 4,488).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i5-4670T

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.7 vs 90.7 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 3000G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 3000G.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 3000G better than Core i5-4670T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 3000G is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670T pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Core i5-4670T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 3000G is the better buy right now. Athlon 3000G comes in $140 cheaper on MSRP at $49 MSRP versus $189 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-4670T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 282.1% better value on MSRP (90.7 vs 23.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 3000G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 3000G vs Core i5-4670T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 3000G

The Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,446 points. Launch price was $49.

Core i5-4670T

The Core i5-4670T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,488 points. Launch price was $220.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 3000G packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4670T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-4670T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 3000G versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4670T — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Athlon 3000G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon 3000G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4670T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 3000G scores 4,446 against the Core i5-4670T's 4,488 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-4670T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 3000G vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670T.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	Core i5-4670T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+52%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6144 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	4,446	4,488
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	956	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,970	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4670T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	Core i5-4670T
Socket	AM4	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon 3000G) / not specified (Core i5-4670T). The Athlon 3000G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3 Graphics), while the Core i5-4670T requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 3000G rivals Pentium Gold G6400.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	Core i5-4670T
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 3 Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 3000G was priced at $49, while the Core i5-4670T came in at $189. On launch pricing ($49 vs $189), Athlon 3000G was $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 3000G delivers 90.7 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670T — making the Athlon 3000G the 117% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	Core i5-4670T
MSRP	$49-74%	$189
Performance per Dollar	90.7+283%	23.7
Release Date	2019	2013

Search Athlon 3000G on Amazon

Search Core i5-4670T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.