Athlon 3000G vs FX-6330

Athlon 3000G vs FX-6330 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 3000G

2 / 4

4,446

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

FX-6330

6 / 6

4,433

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 3000G vs FX-6330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 3000G vs FX-6330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 3000G

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Delivers 123.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.7 vs 40.7 PassMark/$ ($49 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6330

2015

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,433 vs 4,446).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.7 vs 90.7 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 3000G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 3000G.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 3000G better than FX-6330?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-6330 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 3000G pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. FX-6330 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 3000G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 3000G is the better buy right now. Athlon 3000G comes in $60 cheaper on MSRP at $49 MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that FX-6330 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 123.1% better value on MSRP (90.7 vs 40.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 3000G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 3000G vs FX-6330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 3000G

The Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,446 points. Launch price was $49.

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 3000G packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6330 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6330 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 3000G versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Athlon 3000G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6330 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 3000G scores 4,446 against the FX-6330's 4,433 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 3000G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 3000G vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	FX-6330
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.2 GHz+20%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+8433%	6 MB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,446	4,433
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	956	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,970	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6330 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	FX-6330
Socket	AM4	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon 3000G) / not specified (FX-6330). The Athlon 3000G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3 Graphics), while the FX-6330 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 3000G rivals Pentium Gold G6400.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	FX-6330
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 3 Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 3000G was priced at $49, while the FX-6330 came in at $109. On launch pricing ($49 vs $109), Athlon 3000G was $60 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 3000G delivers 90.7 pts/$ vs 40.7 pts/$ for the FX-6330 — making the Athlon 3000G the 76.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 3000G	FX-6330
MSRP	$49-55%	$109
Performance per Dollar	90.7+123%	40.7
Release Date	2019	2015

Search Athlon 3000G on Amazon

Search FX-6330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.