Core i3-7100T
VS
Core i7-2710QE

Core i3-7100T vs Core i7-2710QE

Intel

Core i3-7100T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-2710QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7100T is positioned at rank 568 and the Core i7-2710QE is on rank 1084, so the Core i3-7100T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7100T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9693%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9159%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6650%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2003%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1587%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1388%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
795%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
785%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
714%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
714%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
706%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
687%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
678%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
675%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
669%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
100%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
100%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
99%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
99%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
98%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
98%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
98%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
97%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
97%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
97%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2710QE

#1072
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2958%
#1073
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2914%
#1074
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2675%
#1075
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2663%
#1076
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2639%
#1078
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2548%
#1079
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2444%
#1080
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2440%
#1081
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2374%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
97%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
96%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
96%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
94%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7100T (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-7100TCore i7-2710QE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($39)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2710QE (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-7100TCore i7-2710QE
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($39)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7100T and Core i7-2710QE

Intel

Core i3-7100T

The Core i3-7100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,763 points. Launch price was $117.

Intel

Core i7-2710QE

The Core i7-2710QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,749 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Core i3-7100T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2710QE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2710QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100T versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2710QE — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100T (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-7100T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2710QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100T scores 3,763 against the Core i7-2710QE's 3,749 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-7100T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,157 vs 604, a 62.8% lead for the Core i3-7100T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100T vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2710QE.

FeatureCore i3-7100TCore i7-2710QE
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+13%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+62%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,763
3,749
Geekbench 6 Single
1,157+92%
604
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2710QE uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100T versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-2710QE — the Core i3-7100T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7100T) vs 20 (Core i7-2710QE) — the Core i7-2710QE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B250,H270,Z270 (Core i3-7100T) and HM65,QM67 (Core i7-2710QE).

FeatureCore i3-7100TCore i7-2710QE
Socket
LGA1151
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2710QE). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100T) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2710QE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i7-2710QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2710QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureCore i3-7100TCore i7-2710QE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
Embedded/Industrial
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-7100T launched at $117 MSRP, while the Core i7-2710QE debuted at $378. At current prices ($39 vs $40), the Core i3-7100T is $1 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7100T delivers 96.5 pts/$ vs 93.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-2710QE — making the Core i3-7100T the 2.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-7100TCore i7-2710QE
MSRP
$117-69%
$378
Avg Price (30d)
$39-3%
$40
Performance per Dollar
96.5+3%
93.7
Release Date
2017
2011