
Core i3-7100T

Xeon E5630
Core i3-7100T vs Xeon E5630 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-7100T vs Xeon E5630 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-7100T vs Xeon E5630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-7100T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5630 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Xeon E5630.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5630 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,763 vs 3,785).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5630, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Xeon E5630 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5630
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7100T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7100T.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5630 better than Core i3-7100T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7100T vs Xeon E5630 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7100T
The Core i3-7100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,763 points. Launch price was $117.

Xeon E5630
The Xeon E5630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,785 points. Launch price was $73.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7100T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5630 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100T versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5630 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100T (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Core i3-7100T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5630 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100T scores 3,763 against the Xeon E5630's 3,785 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5630. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100T vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5630.
| Feature | Core i3-7100T | Xeon E5630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+21% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+34% | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 3,763 | 3,785 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,157 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5630 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-7100T | Xeon E5630 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100T) / not specified (Xeon E5630). The Core i3-7100T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100T targets Low Power Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-7100T | Xeon E5630 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














