Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 3 3200U

Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum

Core i3-7100T

2 / 4

3,763

+0.9%

3,730

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 3 3200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7100T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 3200U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 3200U.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 3200U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 3200U

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,730 vs 3,763).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7100T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7100T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 3200U better than Core i3-7100T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 3 3200U is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7100T pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Ryzen 3 3200U also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7100T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 3200U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 3200U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-7100T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7100T vs Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7100T

The Core i3-7100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,763 points. Launch price was $117.

Ryzen 3 3200U

The Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,730 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-7100T and Ryzen 3 3200U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100T versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200U — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200U (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-7100T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses Picasso-U (Zen) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7100T scores 3,763 against the Ryzen 3 3200U's 3,730 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-7100T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200U.

Feature	Core i3-7100T	Ryzen 3 3200U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+31%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Picasso-U (Zen) (2019)
PassMark	3,763	3,730
Geekbench 6 Single	1,157	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3200U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-7100T	Ryzen 3 3200U
Socket	LGA1151	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100T) / not specified (Ryzen 3 3200U). The Core i3-7100T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 3200U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100T targets Low Power Desktop.