Core i3-7102E vs 3015e
Core i3-7102E
3015e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7102E is positioned at rank 974 and the 3015e is on rank 416, so the 3015e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7102E
Performance Per Dollar 3015e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-7102E | 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-7102E | 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7102E and 3015e
Core i3-7102E
The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.
3015e
The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-7102E and 3015e share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E versus 2.3 GHz on the 3015e — a 9.1% clock advantage for the 3015e. The Core i3-7102E uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the 3015e uses Pollock (Zen) (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7102E scores 2,599 against the 3015e's 2,618 — a 0.7% lead for the 3015e. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E vs 4 MB on the 3015e.
| Feature | Core i3-7102E | 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Pollock (Zen) (2020) |
| PassMark | 2,599 | 2,618 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 659 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7102E versus 1600 on the 3015e — the 3015e supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7102E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-7102E) vs 1 (3015e). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7102E) vs 8 (3015e) — the Core i3-7102E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 100 Series,Intel 200 Series (Core i3-7102E) and FT5 (3015e).
| Feature | Core i3-7102E | 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | FT5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | 1600+39900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+419430300% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-7102E) vs true (3015e). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7102E) and Vega 3 (3015e) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120.
| Feature | Core i3-7102E | 3015e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Vega 3 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-7102E and 3015e
