Core i3-7102E vs Core i5-7Y57

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7102E vs Core i5-7Y57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7102E vs Core i5-7Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7102E

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.6 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌455.6% higher power demand at 25W vs 4.5W.

Core i5-7Y57

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 25W, a 21W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,585 vs 2,599).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7102E better than Core i5-7Y57?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-7Y57 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7102E pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i5-7Y57 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7102E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7102E is the better buy right now. Core i3-7102E comes in $56 cheaper on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-7Y57 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 25.6% better value on MSRP (11.6 vs 9.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7102E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-7102E vs Core i5-7Y57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7102E

The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i5-7Y57

The Core i5-7Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,585 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-7102E and Core i5-7Y57 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-7Y57 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-7Y57. Both are built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-7102E scores 2,599 against the Core i5-7Y57's 2,585 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-7102E. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y57.

Feature	Core i3-7102E	Core i5-7Y57
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	3.3 GHz+57%
Base Clock	—	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,599	2,585
Cinebench R23 Multi	659	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7102E versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y57 — the Core i3-7102E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7102E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-7102E) vs 12 (Core i5-7Y57) — the Core i3-7102E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-7102E	Core i5-7Y57
Socket	—	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+29%	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-7102E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7Y57). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7102E) and HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y57) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y57 targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i3-7102E	Core i5-7Y57
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 630	HD Graphics 615
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-7102E was priced at $225, while the Core i5-7Y57 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($225 vs $281), Core i3-7102E was $56 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-7102E delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-7Y57 — making the Core i3-7102E the 22.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-7102E	Core i5-7Y57
MSRP	$225-20%	$281
Performance per Dollar	11.6+26%	9.2
Release Date	2017	2017

Search Core i3-7102E on Amazon

Search Core i5-7Y57 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.