3015e
VS
Core i3-7102E

3015e vs Core i3-7102E

AMD

3015e

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i3-7102E

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The 3015e is positioned at rank 416 and the Core i3-7102E is on rank 974, so the 3015e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar 3015e

#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
99%
#404
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
560%
#405
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
552%
#406
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
507%
#407
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
505%
#408
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
500%
#410
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
483%
#411
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
463%
#412
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
462%
#413
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
450%
#416
3015e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
99%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7102E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26988%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25501%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18516%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5578%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4418%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3865%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2214%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2185%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1989%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1989%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1967%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1914%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1887%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1880%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1863%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
100%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
98%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
97%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
95%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
95%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
95%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
94%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
94%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
94%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
93%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
92%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
91%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
91%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The 3015e delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-7102E in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
Insight3015eCore i3-7102E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight3015eCore i3-7102E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of 3015e and Core i3-7102E

AMD

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i3-7102E

The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

Both the 3015e and Core i3-7102E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E — a 9.1% clock advantage for the 3015e. The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7102E uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i3-7102E's 2,599 — a 0.7% lead for the 3015e. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E.

Feature3015eCore i3-7102E
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz+10%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,618
2,599
Cinebench R23 Multi
659
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015e versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7102E — the 3015e supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7102E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015e) vs 2 (Core i3-7102E). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015e) vs 16 (Core i3-7102E) — the Core i3-7102E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT5 (3015e) and Intel 100 Series,Intel 200 Series (Core i3-7102E).

Feature3015eCore i3-7102E
Socket
FT5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+39900%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
16
64 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (3015e) vs Yes (Core i3-7102E). Both include integrated graphics Vega 3 (3015e) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7102E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120.

Feature3015eCore i3-7102E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Vega 3
Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
Yes