3015e vs Core i5-4258U

3015e vs Core i5-4258U Performance Spectrum

3015e

2 / 4

2,618

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4258U

2 / 4

2,610

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015e vs Core i5-4258U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015e vs Core i5-4258U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015e

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 3, while Core i5-4258U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4258U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i5-4258U

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,610 vs 2,618).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while 3015e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is 3015e better than Core i5-4258U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4258U is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, 3015e pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. 3015e also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, 3015e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

3015e still makes the most sense overall. 3015e comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3015e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

3015e vs Core i5-4258U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-4258U

The Core i5-4258U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,610 points. Launch price was $342.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the 3015e and Core i5-4258U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015e versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-4258U — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4258U (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The 3015e uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4258U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the 3015e scores 2,618 against the Core i5-4258U's 2,610 — a 0.3% lead for the 3015e. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4258U.

Feature	3015e	Core i5-4258U
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.9 GHz+26%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,618	2,610

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4258U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	3015e	Core i5-4258U
Socket	FT5	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (3015e) / not specified (Core i5-4258U). The 3015e includes integrated graphics (Vega 3), while the Core i5-4258U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120.